Miya Bholat
Jul 14, 2026
Fuel trends vary across fleet locations because each site operates under a different mix of fuel prices, taxes, climate, terrain, routes, driver habits, vehicle types, and maintenance conditions. The solution is to compare each location through a consistent fleet fuel management process that connects gallons, cost, mileage, vehicle class, season, and maintenance history instead of judging every site by one fleet average.
A fleet manager sees that Site A used 20 percent more fuel than Site B, even though both locations operate similar vehicles and cover similar mileage. The first assumption may be poor driving or inaccurate logs. The real answer may include colder mornings, steeper routes, traffic, taxes, older vehicles, or longer idle periods.
Fuel can represent more than 30 percent of operating expenses in high mileage transport operations, so location gaps deserve investigation. Effective fleet fuel cost control separates price variance from consumption variance. A site may pay more per gallon, burn more gallons per mile, or face both problems.
Use this first level diagnosis before blaming a driver or location:
| Question | What it reveals | Example metric |
|---|---|---|
| Is fuel more expensive locally? | Tax and supply cost variance | Average cost per gallon |
| Are vehicles using more fuel? | Efficiency or operating variance | Miles per gallon |
| Are routes more demanding? | Terrain, congestion, and stop frequency | Fuel cost per route mile |
| Are vehicles different? | Age, class, load, and engine variance | Miles per gallon by vehicle class |
| Is maintenance inconsistent? | Mechanical causes of higher consumption | Fuel change before and after service |
Fuel prices include refining, distribution, taxes, environmental requirements, retailer costs, and local competition. EIA reported that 2025 average regular gasoline prices ranged from $2.677 per gallon on the Gulf Coast to $4.094 on the West Coast. That gap can make two efficient sites look financially unequal.
Managers should treat regional pricing as a baseline condition, then use fuel management best practices to identify the portion of the gap they can actually control.
As of January 1, 2026, EIA data showed state gasoline taxes and fees ranging from 70.9 cents per gallon in California to about 9 cents in Alaska. State diesel taxes and fees ranged from 87.3 cents in California to about 9 cents in Alaska. Pennsylvania charged 74.1 cents per gallon on diesel, while Texas charged 20 cents. These figures exclude the federal gasoline tax of 18.4 cents and federal diesel tax of 24.4 cents.
For a multi state carrier, the issue extends beyond pump price. IFTA records must connect jurisdiction mileage with fuel purchases and taxes already paid.
Locations farther from refineries, ports, pipelines, and blending terminals generally pay more because transportation and distribution costs rise with distance. EIA also notes that refinery shutdowns, pipeline disruptions, and maintenance can push regional prices higher when replacement supply cannot arrive quickly.
A delivery surcharge of 10 to 20 cents per gallon may appear in remote or constrained markets, depending on contracts, volume, distance, and storage access. California also requires a special gasoline blend and remains relatively isolated from Gulf Coast refining infrastructure, helping explain higher and more volatile West Coast prices.
A location can consume more fuel without an operational failure. Weather and roads change engine warm up time, accessory load, and resistance.
The Department of Energy reports that conventional gasoline vehicles can lose 10 to 20 percent of fuel economy in city driving during cold weather. Short trips can produce losses from 15 to 33 percent, and one test found mileage about 24 percent lower on short trips at 20 degrees Fahrenheit than at 77 degrees.
Cold weather reduces efficiency in several ways:
Northern locations should show a seasonal rise during Q4 and Q1. Concern begins when a site performs worse than its own winter baseline.
Extreme heat increases air conditioning demand and idling. Hilly routes require more engine output, while urban routes create repeated acceleration and braking.
NACFE found that shorter regional haul routes tend to report lower average miles per gallon because trucks spend more time on local roads and less time at steady interstate speeds. This matters when comparing trucking and logistics fleet operations across regions. A city site and a highway site may operate the same truck model but face completely different duty cycles.
Driver behavior reflects local culture, supervision, scheduling pressure, traffic, and route design. One site may enforce shutdown rules while another allows idling during paperwork, loading, or breaks.
Common behavior signals include:
Monthly totals hide these patterns. Pairing fuel records with GPS tracking and telematics helps managers compare mileage, idle time, speed, stops, and fuel use. Focus on behavior that remains inefficient after accounting for local conditions.
Many comparisons fail because vehicles are not equivalent. One branch may run newer vans while another relies on older trucks carrying heavier loads. Engine condition, tires, payload, and service history also differ.
Maintenance conditions that can increase fuel use include:
Consistent preventive maintenance schedules reduce this variation. Managers should also review each vehicle's service history before treating a fuel increase as a driver problem. A location with deferred maintenance may look operationally inefficient when the real cause is mechanical.
Fair comparison requires the same fields, date ranges, vehicle classes, and route categories at every site.
Total gallons ignore distance, load, vehicle class, and local price. Cost per mile and miles per gallon give a better comparison, especially with trip and mileage tracking.
Track these metrics by location:
Paper logs and disconnected spreadsheets create delayed entries and missing mileage. A centralized fuel tracking system compares transactions, vehicles, drivers, mileage, and locations through one record structure.
A fleet reporting dashboard should filter metrics by branch, vehicle type, driver, route, and period without removing local context.
A Minnesota winter site should not receive the same miles per gallon target as a Florida site operating in summer. Each location needs a benchmark based on its own normal conditions and comparable vehicle groups.
Use this review workflow:
Fuel differences are real, measurable, and manageable. Taxes explain part of the gap. Climate, terrain, traffic, drivers, vehicle mix, and maintenance explain the rest.
The practical fix is visibility. AUTOsist brings fuel records, maintenance scheduling, vehicle history, mileage, and reporting into one system so managers can create location aware benchmarks and act on meaningful exceptions. With accurate comparisons, fleets can reduce fuel costs across the fleet without setting unrealistic standards for individual sites.